The letter from the Associated Builders and Contractors
(ABC), "Union deal would inflate cost of Wilson Bridge" (Sept. 1) only
compounds the inaccuracies about unions and project labor agreements (PLAs) put
forth in your editorial, "No 'union only' Wilson Bridge" (Aug. 29). As
the general president of the Laborers' International Union of North America, one
of the largest unions in the construction industry, let me point out some facts
overlooked by the ABC, Virginia Gov. James S. Gilmore III and The Washington
Times.
Despite the claims forwarded by Mr. Gilmore, the ABC and The Times, union
involvement is far more likely to hold steady or decrease the estimated costs.
Not only would a PLA stabilize labor costs, but a 15-state study showed that
paying lower wages does not lead to lower project costs. In fact, the study
pointed out that where states paid the prevailing wage, as Maryland would do
under a PLA, taxpayers saw a cost savings. There are three factors that
contribute to this.
First, union labor is better trained and, as a result, more productive. The
Laborers' International Union of North America provides extensive apprenticeship
and career training programs, keeping our members up to date on the latest
construction techniques, equipment and safety procedures. Our members know how
to do their jobs well - without endangering the lives or property of others.
Second, higher wages, health benefits and pension benefits that will be included
in a PLA will attract the best workers - union or otherwise. Laborers want to
work on the Wilson Bridge, but no worker should be bilked out of fair wages and
benefits by the members of the ABC. Additionally, nonunion workers will be able
to apply for union membership and upgrade their skills with union-sponsored
training.
Finally, a Wilson Bridge PLA will mean a reinvestment of capital into the
greater Washington area. Under a PLA, jobs will go to local workers, meaning
that area residents, their families and communities will benefit. The Laborers'
Union is committed to ensuring that local communities benefit from a
capital investment of this size. Because a project labor agreement will ensure
that workers earn a living wage as well as benefits, the Wilson Bridge will
boost the already booming local economy.
Union labor is the best trained construction work force, contrary to the claims
of the ABC, Mr. Gilmore and The Washington Times. Before you trust Mr. Gilmore
to make another major transportation decision, I would suggest a drive on the
Springfield interchange. In the first 18 months of construction, the Gilmore
administration announced cost overruns of $300 million to $500 million. It's no
wonder Mr. Gilmore and the ABC don't want to stabilize wages. Then they would
lose their scapegoats for mismanagement and incompetence. People of the
District, Maryland and Virginia should not have to suffer through more
Gilmore-ABC glibness on gridlock.
TERENCE M. O'SULLIVAN
General President
Copyright 2000 News World Communications, Inc.