|
October 2,
2000
'Sellout'
is defiantly honest
Nat Hentoff
One of the relatively few
participants in Bill Clinton's impeachment to have emerged with
integrity intact is David Schippers, appointed by Republican Henry
Hyde as chief investigative counsel during the proceedings. The
president has since claimed he "saved the Constitution" by winning
acquittal. Mr. Schippers knows the true
facts. Mr. Schippers has voted
twice for Mr. Clinton. "I'm going to spend some time in purgatory
for that," says Mr. Schippers, a practicing
Catholic. Although Mr. Schippers
had led the Justice Department's Organized Crime and Racketeering
Unit under Attorney General Robert Kennedy, he had been away from
Washington a long time — working as a skilled trial attorney in
Chicago — before returning to the Orwellian morality of a capital in
which leaders of both parties are mesmerized by polls and
chronically accustomed to lying as a way of
survival. His new book, "Sellout"
(Regnery), written with Alan Henry, a widely experienced
investigative journalist, has not received anywhere near the
attention it merits in the media. That's not surprising, since the
press, in all its forms, failed — with very few exceptions — to
cover the fundamental story of why Mr. Clinton was
impeached. In "Sellout," Mr.
Schippers specifically exposes the mainstream press' shallow
downplaying of Mr. Clinton's rampant violations of the Constitution;
obstruction of justice, including tampering with witnesses, serial
perjury, and abuse of power. His pervasive contempt for the
Constitution has also been detailed in "An Affair of State: The
Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton" (Harvard
University Press), by Richard Posner, chief judge of the 7th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals. The
citizenry depended on the media, not Judge Posner, to find out what
was going on. But because most reporters and editors let themselves
become entangled by the White House's expert spinners, the constant
popularity polls showed that most Americans believed that Ken Starr
and the Republican impeachment managers — not the president — had
defiled the Constitution. They thought that the president had only
lied about a private sex
misstep. Accordingly, as Mr.
Schippers shows in appalling detail, the Republican leadership in
the Senate — as frightened by the polls as Dracula confronted by a
cross — forbade an authentic trial of the president. The intimidated
leaders prevented the House managers from calling live witnesses.
They insisted that the managers present only a portion of the
evidence that Mr. Schippers and his team of investigators had
gathered using their extensive federal and police
experience. While Senate
Republicans, led by the pompously ineffective Trent Lott, rescued
the president from conviction (but not from history), congressional
Democrats were determined to hide the evidence, not only from the
public, but also from
themselves. As the House was
deciding whether to impeach the president, Mr. Schippers set up a
secure evidence room stocked with videos, tapes, transcripts,
statements and reports. Not a single House Democrat went into that
room to examine the evidence, but 65 Republicans
did. When the Senate was deciding
whether to convict the president, the evidence room was still open.
But as Mr. Schippers notes in "Sellout," not "one senator of either
party took the time to review the evidence my staff had
gathered." There is one other book
that is essential to understanding why Mr. Clinton should have been
convicted. "Truth at Any Cost," (HarperCollins) is by two reporters
who were not thrown off course by the president's spin doctors both
in and out of the White House. Susan Schmidt of The Washington Post
and Michael Weisskopf have, like Mr. Schippers, provided valuable
source material for future historians; their book, too, has also
been ignored or trashed by most of the
press. The New York Times Book
Review even assigned a mystery writer — a person without even
secondhand reporting knowledge of the Washington minefields — to
make fun of "Truth at Any Cost." I
hope that Brian Lamb will bring some sunlight to the shadow play of
the impeachment by inviting David Schippers to be on C-Span's "Book
Notes." He's already been on C-Span in a less-focused context. And I
hope people around the country who never get invited to Washington
parties will get Mr. Schippers' defiantly honest — and accurately
titled — "Sellout."
Nat Hentoff is a columnist for The Washington Times. His column
runs on Mondays.
|