TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................... iv

 Preliminary statement

BACKGROUND

A.       The Rule

B.       Carpentr B Carpentry Skills

C.       The ShoThe Shop  Steward

D.       D. The Computer  Matching Process

E.       Forde and Greaney

F.       Forde's Prior Violations

Clarke's Complaint

THE FIVE VIOLATIONS

A.       Forde's Violations As Business Manager

1.       Maudsley's Referral of April 23, 1999

2.       Corrigan's Referral of November 1, 1999

a.       Riding the List

b.       The Referral Was Rigged

c.       The Role of Greaney and Forde

d.       Corrigan Jumped Over Other Certified Stewards

B.       The July 2000 Referrals Of Corrigan And Hearty

1....... Corrigan's Referral of July 11, 2000

a.       Riding the List

b.       Greaney Rigged The Referral

c.       Forde's Knowledge of the Violation

2.       Hearty's Referral of July 13, 2000

a....... Riding The List

b....... Greaney Rigged the Referral

c....... Hearty Jumped Over Other Stewards

C.       The Referrals Preceding The Fund-Raiser

1.       Hearty's Referral of February 5, 2001

a....... Riding the List

b....... Greaney Rigged the Referral

c....... Hearty Jumped Over Other Stewards

2.       Corrigan's Referral of March 21, 2001

a....... Riding the List

b....... Greaney Rigged The Referral

c....... Corrigan Jumped Over Other Stewards

D.       The Cover-Up

1.       The Executive Committee's Decision Is Disregarded

2.       The Report

3.       Forde's Failure To Act

4.       The Amendments to the Referral Rules

ARGUMENT

POINT I     The Referral rules WERE unambiguous

POINT II    Forde Committed the VIOLAtion involving Maudsley

POINT III   The Referrals of November 1, 1999, July 13, 2000, February 5, 2001 and March 21, 2001 violated The rules

POINT Iv    the Five violations WERE Part of a systematic  and ongoing scheme to evade the referral rules

 POINT V.... forde failed to disclose the riding-the-list scam and falsified request scam to the government and the court

POINT VI    Forde failed to remedy corrigan's and hearty's violations

POINT VII   Forde failed to remedy Greaney's violations

POINT VIII  Forde aided and abetted THE violations By Greaney, corrigan, and hearty

POINT IX    Forde's Efforts at compliance were the opposite of reasonable

POINT X     FORDE MUST PAY CLARKE'S ATTORNEYS' FEES

POINT XI    FORDE must Make Compensatory REIMBURSEMENTs

POINT XII   Forde must pay sanctions

CONCLUSION