PERRY SHAPIRO, QUINDEL, SAKS & LERNER, S.C.


ATTORNEYS AT LAW
823 NORTH CASS STREET
P,O. BOX 514005
MILWAUKEE. WISCONSIN 53203·3405
RICHARD PERRY
AMY L SHAPIRO
BARBARA ZACK OUINDEL
RICHARD SAKS 414/272.7400
B. MICHELE SUMARA FAX 414/272.7450
OF COUNSEL:
ROBERT J, LERNER                             February 14, 2001

Via UPS Overnight Mail
Wendell Hawkins
529 22nd Avenue
Bellwood, IL 60604

Re: Candidate Eligibility

Dear Mr. Hawkins:

At the February 20, 2001 nomination meeting for Local 2, you were nominated for the position of President and Chicago District Council Delegate. At the candidate eligibility meeting following the nomination meeting, I interviewed you regarding your dues record. The record showed a $241 payment on May 30, 2000. This is the only payment noted in the day book (five year record) for the year 2000. You presented me with the receipt for this payment, which was dated May 31, 2000, in the amount of $241. You noted that there is a line through the bottom of the receipt from January through December which led you to believe you were paid through the entire year. You also stated you thought you actually paid $216 at the end of May for the second, third and fourth quarters, and you paid your first quarter dues in January 2000 at the office. All of your payments were made in cash and you do not have a receipt showing payment for the first quarter of January, February and March, 2000. I indicated that further research on your dues record would need to be performed at the office on Sunday.

After a review of the records at the union office, I determined the following. The records

reflect that for the eligibility period in question, your payments were timely for all quarters in 1999, with your last payment received July 27, 1999 for $144 for the third and fourth quarter of 1999. The next record of payment is the May 31, 2000 for the $241. The daily book, in which the secretary recorded by date all of the payments she received, does not reflect any payment for you during the first quarter of 2000. Nor is there a record of any payment for this quarter in the computer file.

Under Article VIII, Section 4 of the Uniform Local Union Constitution, "The monthly dues are due on the first day of the month and unless paid on or before the last day of the following month, the member shall be deemed suspended by the International Union without notice." In May of 2000, members of Local 2 were being charged a late fee to restore good standing. The payment of $241 on May 31, 2000 is consistent with a payment of $216 for three quarters and a $25 late fee based upon untimely payment of January, February, and March dues.

Your representative, Mr. McGough, has submitted argument on your behalf asserting that

F:\DOCS\LIUNA Elec\Local 2\Corresp\Eligdbility\Hawkins 2-14-01 re eligib.wpd



Wendell Hawkins
February 14, 2001
Page 2

you have maintained the two years continuous good standing required for eligibility.

First, it is argued that your personal statement that you paid dues to Joanne Caruso, secretary of Local 2, in January, 2000 is supported by other evidence, despite the lack of any written record of payment. The evidence asserted to support your payment is the statement by Ms. Caruso that she recalls you to be timely in your dues payment and a trustworthy person and that business agents with whom you worked were informed during January, February, and March that you were a member in good standing.

I interviewed Ms. Caruso who stated that she could not specifically recollect a payment by you in January, 2000, but did believe you were always timely in your payment of dues. Her procedure, following receipt of dues, was to mark the day book and write out a receipt. At the end of the day, she recorded the receipts, in numerical order, in the daily book and balanced the total with the money received. The receipts would then be entered into the computer. I asked her if there was no record of payment for the first quarter in the five year day book, the daily book, or on the computer what her explanation would be. She responded that if it were not recorded in any of these places, the payment was not received, unless it was mistakenly credited to a different member. Ms. Caruso also stated that a member charged $241 in May was being assessed a late fee for the first quarter payment, or an earlier quarter for which they had been late.

In making eligibility determinations regarding an issue concerning dues payments, I have reviewed the dues records of Local 2. Where a member's statement as to when dues were paid conflicted with those records, I have given members the opportunity to present me with documentation to support their statements as to the time of payment. If a member has been unable to provide me with some documentary evidence showing the time or existence of a disputed dues payment, I have based my determination of eligibility on the records.

Here, the disputed payment is alleged to have been made in cash in January of 2000. You do not have any documentation to establish that you made this payment, nor do Ms. Caruso's statements establish that payment was made. The contention that other union officials checked with the office and were told you were in good standing cannot overcome the lack of direct evidence on this point.

Furthermore, the fact that the local union charged you a late fee in May, 2000 is consistent with the absence of any payment for the first quarter of 2000. While the union incorrectly marked the May 315 receipt as payment for the full year, this would not have been consistent with either the amount of the payment owed for a full year ($244), nor with your position that you had already paid for January, February, and March, 2000.



Wendell Hawkins
February 14, 2001
Page 3

made a timely payment of dues for January, February, and March, 2000.

The second argument raised on your behalf is that the union's error in crediting you with payment for each quarter in 2000 should prevent a finding of untimely payment for the first quarter. It is asserted that because the dues records for Local 2 were in poor condition during the relevant time period for eligibility purposes for this election, a candidate should not be ruled ineligible on the basis of these records.

This election is being run pursuant to the eligibility rules set forth in Article V of the Uniform Local Union Constitution. To excuse a member from making timely payment of dues or to presume that such payment was made based on general concerns with the bookkeeping of Local 2 would be equivalent to creating a variance. This the Election Officer cannot do.

Here, the error by the Local in attributing the May 31, 2000 payment of $241 as payment for the full year occurred after January, February, and March dues were owed. If no payment was made for the first quarter, this cannot be cured by asserting reliance on the error in the May receipt.

Accordingly, I find that you have not maintained continuous good standing for the two years prior to the nomination meeting and, therefore, are ineligible to run in this election.

You have the right to appeal this eligibility decision to the Independent Hearing Officer within 24 hours after receiving the decision. You must request an appeal in writing and include your address and telephone number. The appeal, with a copy of this decision, shall be sent by personal delivery, overnight mail or facsimile transmission to:

Peter F. Vaira

Independent Hearing Officer

1600 Market Street, Suite 2650

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Facsimile: (215) 751-9420


A copy of the appeal shall also be sent to me at the above address.