UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
ALEXIS M.
HERMAN., Secretary of the United
STATES Department of Labor.
|
 |
| |
Plaintiffs,
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CONSENT DECREE |
|
MASON TENDERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF GREATER
NEW YORK, et, al. |
94 Civ. 6487
(RWS)
|
|
WHEREAS, plaintiffs United States of America and Alexis
M. Herman, Secretary, United States Department of Labor (the
"Government") commenced this action on September 8, 1994, by filing a
complaint pursuant to the civil remedies provisions of the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Practices Act, in U.S.C. S 1961 seq. ("RICO"),
and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. SS
1001 et seq. ("ERISA"), seeking equitable relief against, alia„
defendants the Mason Tenders District Council of Greater
New York (the "District Council"), and the District council's Executive
Board; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, the Government's September 8, 1994 Complaint
also sought equitable relief against employee benefit funds affiliated
with the District Council, including the mason Tenders District Council
Pension Fund, the Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, The Mason
Tenders District Council Annuity Fund, the Mason Tenders District
Council Asbestos Training Fund (now the Mason
|
|
Tenders Training Fund), the Mason Tenders District
Council Industry Fund (now the Mason Tenders District Council
Scholarship Fund ), the Mason Tenders District Council Legal Services
Fund and the Mason Tenders District Council Vacation Fund (collectively,
with the Mason Tenders District Council Funds' Employees' Pension Plan,
referred to hereafter as the 'Mason Tenders Trust Funds"), and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, on December 27, 1994, this court entered a
consent decree resolving the Government's action against the District
Council, its Executive Board and the Mason Tenders Trust Funds, which
decree was modified by a Stipulation and order dated May 15, 1995
(collectively, the "original Consent Decree"); and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, the provisions of the Original Consent Decree
continue in full force and effect; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, on January 17, 1995, pursuant to the Original
Consent Decree, the Court appointed Lawrence B. Pedowitz as Monitor the
"Monitor") and Michael Chertoff as Investigations Officer (the
"Investigations Officer"), each for a term of 48 (forty-eight) months
with the powers as set forth in the Original Consent Decree; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, under the Original Consent Decree the Monitor
and the Investigations Officer may apply to the Court to extend the
terms of their appointment upon a showing of good cause and upon
reasonable notice to the Government and the lawful, representatives of
the District
|
|
Council, its Executive Board and the Mason Tenders Trust
Funds, and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, the purpose or the Original Consent Decree were
to eliminate corruption and the involvement of organized crime, directly
and indirectly, in the affairs of the District Council, its constituent
local unions, and the Mason Tenders Trust Funds and to ensure that those
entities were run democratically, prudently, with integrity, in
accordance with law, solely for the benefit of their members,
participants and beneficiaries, and without unlawful outside influence;
and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Monitor, the District
council and its constituent local unions have made excellent progress
towards achieving the purposes of the Original Consent Decree; and
|
|
WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Monitor, the Mason - Tenders Trust Funds are now
being operated prudently and highly effectively by its Trustees, consistent with
the purposes of the original Consent Decree, and with exemplary support from the
Funds, Director and administrators, as well as Fund Service Providers, which
include legal counsel, accountants, actuarial consultants and financial
managers; and
|
WHEREAS, the terms of the Monitor and Investigations
Officer under the Original Consent Decree will not be extended and,
accordingly, will expire on
|
|
January 17, 1999, except that the Monitor and
Investigations Officer will continue and complete their reporting
responsibilities and any disciplinary and review matters initiated
before the end of their term; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, in the experience of the Government, organized
crime often attempts to reassert its influence into enterprises from
which it has been removed; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, in January 1995, the Laborers International
Union of North America ("LIUNA"), amended its Constitution to adopt an
Ethical Practices Code ("EPC") and an Ethics and Disciplinary Procedure
("EDP") designed to rid LIUNA of the influence of organized crime; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, the EDP and EPC apply to the District Council,
its constituent local unions and all officers, members, employees and
agents of the District Council and its constituent local unions; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, the District Council and the Mason Tenders Trust
Funds desire to ensure the continued lawful operation of, and to protect
against the infiltration of corruption and organized crime influences
at, the District Council, the Mason Tenders Trust Funds, the District
Council's present and future constituent or affiliated local unions,
which currently consist of LIUNA Locals 66, 780 790 279 and 1261, and
any employee benefit funds or plans affiliated with, or sponsored or
administered by the
|
|
4
District Council's past, present and future constituent
or affiliated local unions (collectively the
"MTDC"); and
|
|
|
WHEREAS in order to further the purposes of the Original
Consent Decree and to protect against the infiltration Of corruption and
organized crime influences, the District Council and the Board of
Trustees of the Mason Tenders Trust Funds have requested the ability to
consult with a court-appointed officer in the future about the
operations of the MTDC; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS, the District council, its Executive Board and
the Mason Tenders Trust Funds enter into this Supplemental consent
Decree as the representative of their respective memberships and/ox
participants, beneficiaries, employees, trustees and agents; and
|
|
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Mason
Tenders Trust Funds consents to the relief sought
herein; and
|
|
|
WHEREAS,
the Business Manager of the District Council is
empowered under the District Council constitution to
consent to the relief contained herein on behalf of the District Council
and its constituent local unions;
|
| |
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED
AS FOLLOWS
|
|
1. Jurisdiction. The District Council, the District
Council Executive Board, and the Mason Tenders Trust Funds acknowledge
that this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action
and that this
|
|
5
|
Supplemental consent Decree is a proper exercise of
the Court's jurisdiction.
|
|
|
2. Permanent Injunctions. The, terms and scope of the
permanent injunction set forth in paragraph 3 of the original consent
Decree, which provides:
|
|
| |
All current and future officers, agents, representatives,
employees, and members of the MTDC [as defined in the opening paragraph
of the Original Consent Decree) and of its constituent locals are
permanently enjoined:
|
|
-
| |
from committing
any act of racketeering, as defined in 18 U.S.C, §1961;
|
|
-
| |
from knowingly associating with any member or
associate of any La Cosa Nostra crime family or any other criminal
group, or with any person prohibited from participating in union
affairs; and
|
|
-
| |
from obstructing or otherwise interfering with the
work of the court-appointed officers described herein or with the
purposes of the Consent Decree;
|
|
is modified so that the proscription in subpart (c)
quoted above shall apply to the work of the Review Monitor as
described in this Supplemental Consent Decree.
|
|
|
3. Court upon entry of this
Supplemental Consent Decree, the Court shall appoint Lawrence B.
Pedowitz as Review Monitor to review certain operations of the MTDC as
described herein.
|
|
|
4. Review Monitor. The Review Monitor Shall have the
following powers, rights, and responsibilities:
|
|
6
|
a. Access to Information. The Review monitor shall
have the power;
|
|
-
|
to
request and receive periodic reports and other Information regarding
the operations of the MTDC, including, but not limited to, reports
concerning the training of shop stewards, from the District
Council's Business Manager, other District Council officers and
delegates and/or officers of the District Council's present and
future constituent local unions;
|
|
-
to request
and receive periodic reports and other
information regarding the operation, administration and investments of the
Mason Tenders Trust Funds or any employee benefit funds affiliated with, or
sponsored or administered by, a past, present or
future constituent local union of the District Council from the
Fund Directors, administrators, trustees or legal counsel of
the Mason Tenders Trust Funds or any officers of the District Council's
constituent local unions who serve as trustees of any
employee benefit funds affiliated with, or sponsored or administered by a
past, present or future constituent local union of the District council,
provided that communications from legal counsel of the Mason Tenders Trust
Funds to the Review Monitor, to the extent they include information that is
privileged, shall be deemed to be in the common
interest of the fund and the Review Monitor
7
|
and, therefore, shall not constitute a waiver of
the fund's attorney-client privilege); and
|
|
|
iii, to receive communications regarding any facts and
circumstances tending to demonstrate a violation of the purposes of the
Original Consent Decree or the permanent injunctive
provisions or the original Consent
Degree, as described in paragraph 2, above, from: (a) any officer or
delegate of the 'District council; (b) the Funds' Director, Trustees or
legal counsel (whose communications shall not be considered a waiver of
privilege for the reasons stated above) of the
Mason Tenders Trust Funds; (c) any officer of the District Council's
present or future constituent local unions; (d) any administrator,
trustee or legal counsel (whose communications shall not be considered a
waiver 01 privilege for the reasons stated -
above) of any employee benefit fund or plan affiliated with, or
sponsored or administered by, a past, present or future constituent
local union; or (e) any member, participant, beneficiary, agent or
representative of the MTDC,
|
|
b. Review of Constituent Locals. The District Council
shall advise the Review Monitor at least ninety (90) days in advance of the
proposed effective date of: (i) any proposed dissolution of a constituent local
union of the . District Council; (ii) any proposed addition of
a local union as a constituent local union Of the District
Council; or (iii) any proposed merger or consolidation involving any
8
|
constituent local union of the District Council.
The Review Monitor shall have the authority to require the District
Council to present to him within forty'-five (45) days thereafter (i) a
financial and/or legal analysis of the proposed impact of any such
proposed dissolution, addition, merger or consolidation, and/or (ii) a
legal and financial audit of the proposed added, merged or consolidated
local union performed by counsel and attorneys determined by the Review
Monitor, in his sole and unreviewable discretion, to be competent. The
Review Monitor may seek an order from this court authorizing the Review
Monitor to veto any such proposed dissolution, addition, merger or
consolidation that; (i) ,constitutes or furthers
an act of racketeering as defined in la U.S.C. S 1961; (ii) furthers or
contributes to the association, directly or indirectly, of any member,
employee, or agent of the MTDC with any element of organized crime;
(iii) is contrary to or violates applicable laws or regulations; or (iv)
is inconsistent with the purposes of the Original Consent Decree.
|
|
|
c. |
Review of Certain Transactions Involving The Mason
tenders Trust Funds
|
|
The Mason Tenders Trust Funds and/or any officer of the
District Council's constituent local unions who serve as trustees of any
employee benefit fund affiliated with, or sponsored or administered by a
present or future constituent or affiliated local union of the
District council shall advise the Review monitor at
|
|
9
least ninety (90) days in advance
of the proposed effective date of any: (i) proposed
establishment, termination, or dissolution of any Mason Tenders Trust Fund or
any employee benefit fund affiliated with, or sponsored or administered by a
present or future constituent local union of the District Council, or (ii)
proposed merger, consolidation, or transfer of assets between or among the Mason
Tender Trust Funds and any employee benefit funds. The Review Monitor shall have
the authority to require the Mason Tenders Trust Funds to present to him within
forty-five (45) days thereafter a financial and/or legal analysis of the
proposed impact of any such transaction, performed by accountants and counsel
determined by the Review Monitor, in his sole and unreviewable discretion, to be
competent. In addition, the Review Monitor may request any, employee benefit
fund affiliated with, or sponsored or administered
by, a present or future constituent or affiliated local union of
the 1)istriet Council to present to him within forty-five (45) days thereafter a
financial and/or legal analysis of the proposed impact of any such transaction
involving such fund, performed by accountants and counsel determined by the
Review Monitor, in his sole and unreviewable discretion, to be competent, The
Review Monitor may seek an order from this Court authorizing the Review Monitor
to veto any proposed establishment, termination or-dissolution of any Mason
Tenders Trust Fund or any proposed merger,
10
|
consolidation or transfer of assets involving any Mason Tenders
Trust Fund that: (i) constitutes or furthers an act of racketeering as
defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961; or (ii) furthers or contributes to the
association, directly or indirectly, of any member, employee, or agent
of the-MTDC with any element of organized crime; (iii) is contrary to or
violates any applicable law or regulation; (iv) is inconsistent with the
purposes of the Original Consent Decree; or (v) would have a material,
adverse impact on the affected fund or plan. To the extent that the
Review Monitor has similar concerns outlined in subparts (i) through (v)
in the preceding sentence regarding any proposed establishment,
termination or dissolution of any employee benefit fund affiliated with,
or sponsored or administered by, a present or future constituent or
affiliated local union of the District Council, the Review Monitor may
discuss those concerns with the United States Attorneys' Office for the
Southern District of New York, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and/or the United States Department of Labor.
|
|
|
d.
Review of Appointments. The District Council, the Mason Tenders Trust
Funds and/or any officers of the District Council's constituent local
unions who serve as trustees of any employee benefit fund affiliated
with, or sponsored or administered by, a present or future
constituent or affiliated local union of the District
|
|
11
|
Council shall advise the Review Monitor at least
thirty (30) days in advance (unless exigent circumstances necessitate a
shorter notice period) of any proposed appointment of a trustee, Funds'
Director or Fund Service Provider to the Mason
Tenders Trust Funds or any employee benefit fund affiliated with, or
sponsored or administered by a present or future constituent or
affiliated local union of the District Council. The Review Monitor may
seek an order from this Court authorizing the Review Monitor to veto any
such proposed appointment at any Mason Tenders Trust Fund that: (i)
constitutes or furthers an act of racketeering as defined in 18 U.S.C.
§ 1961; (ii) furthers or contributes
to the association, directly or indirectly, of any member, employee, or
agent of the MTDC with any element of organized crime; (Iii) is contrary
to or Violates any applicable law or regulation; or (iv) is inconsistent
with the purposes of the Original Consent Decree. To the extent that the
Review Monitor has similar concerns outlined in subparts (i) through
(iv) in the preceding sentence regarding any such proposed appointment
at any employee benefit fund affiliated with, or
sponsored or administered by, a present or future
constituent or affiliated local union of the District Council, the
Review Monitor may discuss those concerns with the United states
Attorneys, Office. for the Southern District of New York, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and/or the United States Department of Labor.
|
|
12