The Laborers Network
www.thelaborers.net ©1998-2006. All
Rights Reserved.
[ Court Decisions affecting LIUNA ]
[ Locals ]
Published with permission of the
publisher for exclusive
viewing on the Laborers Network. Not
for republication on Gangbox
or Jawin
Laborers for JUSTICE© 1997-2006 All Rights reserved. Not for republication on the internet without permission.
Mobsters, Unions, and Feds Buy this book on
Amazon
Mobsters, Unions, and
Feds
Organized Crime and the
American Labor Movement
James B. Jacobs
www.nyupress.org
© 2005 by
All rights reserved.
CIP tk
New York University Press books are
printed on acid-free paper, and their binding materials are chosen for strength
and durability.
Manufactured in the
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
This book is dedicated to Herman
Benson.
“Racketeering
is the cancer that almost destroyed the American trade-union movement.”
-David
Dubinsky, president of the International Ladies Garment Workers (1932 –
1966). David Dubinsky and A. Raskin, David Dubinsky: A Life with Labor (New
York: Simon & Schuster, 1977), 145.
“American
labor had better roll up its sleeves, it had better get the stiffest broom and
brush it can find, and the strongest soap and disinfectant, and it had better take
on the job of cleaning its own house from top to bottom and drive out every
crook and gangster and racketeer we find, because if we don’t clean our own
house, then the reactionaries will clean it for us. But they won’t use a broom, they’ll use an
ax, and they’ll try to destroy the labor movement in the process.”
-Walter
Reuther, president of the United Automobile Workers (1946 – 1970). Opening address of the sixteenth
constitutional convention of the United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural
Implement Workers of America,
Contents
Preface
Acknowledgements
List of Acronyms
| 1 | Introduction |
1 |
| 2 | Organized Crime and Organized Labor |
41 |
| 3 | President’s Commission on Organized Crime |
68 |
| 4 |
Labor
Racketeering in |
103 |
| 5 | Organized Labor’s Response to Organized Crime |
138 |
| 6 | Labor Racketeering and the Rank and File |
184 |
| 7 | Attacking Labor Racketeering Prior to Civil RICO (1982) |
203 |
| 8 |
Civil RICO Suits and Trusteeships |
240 |
| 9 | The Liberation of IBT Local 560 |
270 |
| 10 | The NYC District Council of Carpenters |
315 |
| 11 | The Four Big Bad International Unions |
352 |
| 12 | Evaluating Civil RICO |
415 |
| 13 | Concluding Reflections |
440 |
Endnotes 458
Bibliography 535
Index 000
Labor
racketeering is an important example of American exceptionalism. No other
country has a history of significant organized crime infiltration of its labor movement
and no other country has an organized crime syndicate whose power base is the
labor movement. The inter-relationship over most of the 20th century
of organized crime and organized labor has political, social and economic
consequences that have hardly begun to be explored. This book is a beginning.
This
book is not an expose. There are no secrets here revealed. From the early 20th
century, labor racketeering has been an important source of organized crime’s
power, prestige and wealth. By “labor racketeering,” I mean the exploitation of
unions and union power by organized crime. By “labor racketeers,” I mean Cosa
Nostra[*]
bosses who wield influence over union office holders and treasuries, Cosa
Nostra capos, soldiers and associates
who hold union offices, and union officials who are closely allied to, and do
the bidding for organized crime members. Labor racketeers treat unions as cash
cows which generate money via legal salaries and perks and by embezzlement,
extortion, bribes and fraud. They
regularly exploit union power by establishing and enforcing employer cartels
that fix prices, allocate contracts and suppress competition. For these
services they extract payoffs (“dues”) from employer associations. Moreover, it is just a short step to taking
full or partial ownership in one or more of the firms that comprise the cartel.
In
their exploitation of unions, labor racketeers commit numerous criminal
offenses, e.g. extortion of employers
by threatening unlawful strikes, work stoppages, picketing, and sabotage (labor
peace extortion); soliciting and
receiving bribes (labor bribery) from employers in exchange for
advantageous contract terms and for allowing the employer to ignore the terms of
a collective bargaining agreement (“sweetheart deal”); thefts and embezzlements from the union and its pension and welfare
funds; murder, assault and battery, arson
and other violent crimes against rank and file “dissidents” and uncooperative
employers; and anti-trust violations
by means of price fixing, contract allocations and preventing competitors from
entering a market.1
Despite
the fact that labor racketeering in general and specific cases of labor racketeering
have been steadily exposed over much of the twentieth century by Congressional
and other hearings, investigative journalists and criminal and civil
racketeering cases, labor racketeering has not attracted much interest from
university-based scholars. Students of crime, law and society, American history
and even American labor history have pretty much ignored this seamy side of
labor unions.
While
there is a large subfield in criminology devoted to corporate crime, there is
no corresponding subfield of union crime.
Even though Edwin Sutherland invented the field of white collar crime, Sutherland’s and Cressey’s best-selling general
criminology text does not even mention labor corruption or labor racketeering.
Even organized crime scholars, of whom there are very few, fail to recognize
that the Mafia’s unique political and economic position in American society
derives from its base in the labor movement.
Academic
labor lawyers do not view labor racketeering as part of their bailiwick. Their courses give short shrift to the 1957 –
1959 U.S. Senate (McClellan Committee) labor racketeering hearings, the most
extensive congressional investigation in
No
labor law casebook mentions United States
v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, perhaps the most ambitious
organizational reform case in American history.
The Department of Justice filed its civil racketeering complaint in the
IBT International case in 1988. The case was settled in 1989, but the remedial
phase of the litigation, i.e. the enforcement of the settlement, continues to
this day (early 2005) with no end in sight.2
[‡]